In the design of our policies, procedures and actions, we always take into consideration the best interest of the child, in order to protect and support the positive child-parent relationship. Concertedly, the design of the security measures does not outweigh the needs of the situation of the child. [This article refers to 3 stages: start of the detention (maybe police detention), imprisonment, after release. So my comments refer to the stage of imprisonment]

Romania has promoted the Recommendation CM/Rec (2018) 5 at the level of the detention units by posting it on the internal portal of NAP, which all the prison staff members have access to.

Child Protection Policy renewed in 2019 and in place across all prisons. Other relevant changes may be implemented in the light of proposals to incorporate the UNCRC into Scots law

Children of incarcerated parents must be given a voice. Measures to strengthen the role of parents, child welfare and family life as well as the privacy of children must be more installed.

The best interests of the child are not always taken into account. The child is not really heard. He does not have the floor. Parent-child relationship support agencies (such as REP) are overwhelmed. There are waiting lists. These are organizations that are poorly supported financially and have significant structural difficulties. There are few specific organizations that help inmates in their reintegration to work on child-parent relationships.

The rights and interests of the child are very rarely taken into consideration for men during an incarceration. It is more so for women (there are probably more alternatives to detention that are decided upon) and, moreover, there are nurseries that allow children under the age of 3 to stay in detention with their mothers (after analysis of the child's interests by specialized organizations such as the ONE, sometimes in consultation with youth protection services or the family judge).

If imprisonment is considered, the rights and best interests of the children concerned should be taken into account and reasonable alternatives to imprisonment should be used as far as possible. In case of imprisonment of a parent, placement in close proximity to the children should be sought.

Usually, prison sentences are served in the unit which is the nearest to the inmate’s residence.

In the event that one of the parents is imprisoned, efforts must be made to ensure that the children are placed in close proximity to them.

Prisoners are allocated to a local establishment when this is possible and in line with sentence plan

Even if it is the ideal and if it is the course of action, security imperatives or problems of overpopulation often decide otherwise.

This is still not often enough the case

The prison administration shall endeavor to collect and collate relevant information at entry regarding the children of those detained. Social workers obtain information about the inmates’ children during an interview, with the aim to identify the cases which need assistance.

Prisoners are asked on admission about any children they may have There are legal restrictions on the use and storage of data about children

The information is requested by the social worker at the time of the incarceration, but not recorded.

The prison administration shall collect relevant information on the children of the detainees at the beginning of their imprisonment.

Meetings between the institutionalized children and their parents in custody are organized based upon the centrally concluded partnership between the National Administration of Penitentiaries and the National Authority for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Children and Adoption.

Funding is available through the Assisted Prison Visits scheme for those family members who meet eligibility criteria Prison visitor centres which offer a place for families to rest and chat before/after a visit are supported with funding from Scottish Government.

State institutions and civil society organisations must be provided with sufficient resources to adequately support children of incarcerated parents and their families.

It's really not enough. The means granted to the organizations are unstable (subsidies that must be requested for renewal every year). They are often precarious contracts. There is a lot of turnover in these organizations, which does not allow for good continuity in the work. There are not enough staff. It would be necessary to make these organizations more sustainable through more stable and consistent funding to increase the supply. And the reorganization in prisons (rationalization of staff by reducing the number of personnel) makes it difficult in some prisons - the oldest) - to set up activities or maintenance (problems for the movement of inmates, lack of offices, etc.).

Several NGOs i.e. the Centre of Èxpertise K I N D (kind means child) are helping the prison service training institute to develop a toolkit for professionals and specific training for prison staff. The centre also provides one to one advice.

eLearning package developed for all staff on Family Strategy, Corporate Parenting and Child Protection, although training is currently not taking place because of COVID emergency

Staff of domestic authorities who are in contact with children and their detained parents shall be adequately trained.

There is a training center for staff on each language side of the country, but such training modules are not offered.

This does not concern the area of correctional services.The responsibility lies with the interior ministries.

Prisoners who are untried are entitled to frequent visits in line with Prison Rules (a 30 minute visit every weekday; a visit at the weekend where one has not been taken during the week).

The courts or public prosecutors' offices are responsible for this. As far as there are no procedural safeguards, contact with the children must be made possible in a timely manner. In the Laender, rapid contact is guaranteed, for example, through visits, letters or telephone calls. In addition, more extensive visitation opportunities are regularly granted, particularly in the context of pre-trial detention.

From the day after his imprisonment, the detainee may receive visits from his children (provided that the child under 16 years of age is accompanied and that the family relationship can be proven). If there are restrictions issued by the judge, it is a 72-hour incommunicado detention during which the detainee can have no contact with anyone (except lawyer). Other measures can be taken for longer periods of time, but rarely with respect to children unless they are obviously victims.

This does not concern the area of correctional services. The courts or public prosecutors' offices are responsible for this.

For men, these are certainly not decisive criteria. It's more often the case for women.

We are granting prison leave or transfers with or without escort – this is depending on several factors - so as the imprisoned parent to attend special family events.

Such visits may be possible for those prisoners who are entitled to day or home leave Special Escorted leave may be considered where applicable

The prison laws of the Laender provide for extensive and varied possibilities of relaxation or measures to open up the prison for suitable prisoners. In addition to regular release, these also include, for example, holidays, long-term exits, exits and executions for important reasons. Family reasons should continue to be taken into account.

It is provided for by law but too rarely granted on such grounds. If the detainee is granted leave, he has 3 leaves for a period of 3 months, which he must first set according to the steps to be taken before family interests most often take precedence. If a family event occurs and he no longer has leave to take advantage of, it is more difficult for him to be granted a release. He will often be granted for a funeral or to go to the bedside of a sick relative or for a specific procedure, but rarely if ever for a birthday or the beginning of the school year.

Inherently clarified by the police acting jointly with child and youth welfare when being arrested

On admission, during the initial interview and screening we collect the necessary information about the children that will enable Prisons to make relevant arrangements for the children.

It’s a legal requirement and principle to place the convict in the prison closest to their home – in case it is possible

Question on Governor Committal Interview (GCI) and referral to DLP

Is part of the check-in interview and ‘child-check’

Implemented in Norwegian law

Every person admitted is given the opportunity to make a phonecall A Core screen is offered within 72 hours of admission which covers immediate issues of concern relating to coming into custody including child care issues and any concerns about visits These concerns can also be raised at Induction. Family Contact Officers provide support

The chairman of the senate may allow a reasonable period of time to start serving his sentence so that the convicted person can procure his affairs.

It should be clarified by the police when arrested together with child and social service, although the staaf always ask about it when they have knowledge that the inmate have children.

Sentencing summonses usually allow sentenced persons sufficient time to ensure the care of children during detention. In these cases, as well as when prisoners are brought in after police arrests, the care obligations of the prisoners are immediately ascertained at the initial reception in order to be able to arrange support and assistance measures for the children concerned, if necessary. Furthermore, especially in cases of pre-trial detention, the responsibility lies with the courts or public prosecutors' offices as well as with the interior ministries in cases of arrests.

The police often contact the prison beforehand when a mother is to be incarcerated and has a baby/child under the age of 3 years. But all too often, we still have testimonies of children left at a friend's, a neighbor's, or in the best of cases, at a close relative's home, but sometimes without a lasting solution. It is in the days or weeks following incarceration that solutions are sought.

During the modalities of the entrance in an prison (first interview by the special services) the inmates are asked about their personal data. Following, this data is fed into the EVM (Austrian electronic system of inmates data). However, this individual inmate data (text files) cannot recalled automated (yet), so accordingly to this, the number of affected children cannot be filtered out. The responsible IT administration has to be asked if and how the data could be recalled automated so as the Directorate General for the prison Service has a central access to the data of affected children.

We collect the number of children and their ages in order to facilitate the attendance of their imprisoned parents to important family events with home leaves or transfers, and also to address any particularities and needs of the children who will visit our premises, so as to make the environment for them as friendly as possible to support the child-parent relationship. For example, for the children with disabilities or with any other special needs we facilitate the visits accordingly in the best interest of the children

It is registered upon admission

Question on GCI

BRIK mapping - the number and age of children is recorded. The number and age of child inmates do not have legal care for registered

During the quarantine and observation period, all the inmates are assessed socially and information about his/her children’s number, sex and age and the person/institution taking care of the children is recorded and, then, periodically updated while serving the custodial sentences.

Prisoners are offered the opportunity to state their family circumstances during the core screen interview and as part of the Integrated Case Management process Data on children of prisoners is not collated on the prison records system. There are legal restrictions on the holding of data about children

It is a part of admissions interview with inmates

During the access their is an interview with the inmate, the inmates are asked about it and the data is fed into the client system

As a rule, the required data are not collected. Only with regard to age and number of children has the recommendation already been implemented in some Laender. However, the important main caregiver is not recorded so far. In future, the age, number and main carer of the children should be collected by the prisons in compliance with the respective applicable data protection regulations. It would be desirable to also collect the following personal data: Date of birth of the children, other parent, distinction between natural/social child, place of residence of the child, offices involved, maintenance obligation, custody. With regard to research and evaluation purposes (cf. Recommendation No. 52), the age and number of children of prisoners must be recorded in a statistically evaluable manner - if applicable, via the specialised prison procedures. All data must be kept up to date as far as possible. As a rule, the data is based on the information provided by the prisoners; there is no comparison of the data with third parties.

This is an important gap. There is no systematization of the recording of these data, nor is there a regular update.

At the request of the inmates, the relatives could be informed about the place of stay by the special services.

On admission, prisons assist each prisoner to contact any relative or person to inform him/her about his/her imprisonment accordingly

Upon admission envelope is granted free of charge. In case of transfer, the officer is obliged to inform the prisoner about the exact time and date, and the location of the transfer

Question about family awareness on GCI

Question about family awareness by special case manager/family functionnaire

Has developed brochures for children who shall visit parent in prison. In prison Child coordinator and social worker helps with information. Contact with relatives during incarceration, as long as the inmate wishes and has given his consent to the contact. If inmates need advice and guidance on telling their children about the imprisonment or other matters related to children, they can contact the child coordinator or it is recommended to contact NGO such as Church City Mission - Prisoners Children or The Organisation for Families and Friends of Prisoners (FFP).

Upon inmates’ admission or in case of their transfer, the family and the child’s caregiver are informed of the accommodation place by the prison administration.

Prisoners are given access to a pin phone so that they are able to inform their families. Special requests can be made to top up pin phone credit

The relatives could be informed about the place of stay by the prisoned person. Using telephone (start- up credit)

Prisoners are to be sensitised to contacting their children after entering prison. Many Laender prison laws and the prison rules of procedure already contain information on informing relatives. In the access procedure, prisoners should be shown the possibilities to inform their children. If necessary, the prisoners are to be supported. This also applies to transfers and relocations.

On the homepage of the respective prisons, information about the current visit times can be found only in German language. The house rules, which all inmates receive and which are translated into different languages, contain more detailed informations about the visit modalities. These informations could be given to the inmates relatives. Due the fact, that the information about the contact modalities are not available in a child friendly manner, the idea is creating a brochure for children who visit the prison the first time accordingly to the folder of Norway and Sweden.

On admission each inmate is informed about the rules of visits, appointments for visits, procedures etc. Further, the relevant office contacts the potential visitors of each inmate for informing about the visiting modalities, procedures etc, so they pave the way for a child-friendly environment.

Carried out upon admission

First Contact Assessment with Integrated Sentence Manager

Information by family functionnaire of the prison service and special information for children on the prison service website NGOs also made video films to inform children

Several prisons have children's pages on the website and the directorate has made a booklet aimed at children visiting prisons. FFP has prepared information material such as several films and written information material aimed at children – “ Lisa visits dad in prison”, inmates – “Are you mom or dad and in prison?” and against caregivers on the outside – “Outside the wall” - a handbook for you as a relative.

There are user-friendly materials (posters and flyers) addressed to the children visiting their parents in custody.

SPS website has information regarding visits. Booklets and induction processes are in place. Family Contact officers support new admissions to understand arrangements for visits and family contact. With the consent of the prisoner, families should be contacted or sent an information pack as part of the induction process. Scope to make information more child-friendly

First Contact Assessment with Integrated Sentence Manager we are considering publishing an information brochure

There is a special website for the children with all information and before visits information is sent he children.

Children need special age-appropriate support (visits outside school hours, on weekends and holidays, child-friendly visiting and waiting areas, uncomplicated communication via telephone, letters, etc.) in establishing contact with their parents in detention. Age-appropriate information on the existing contact options and how they are organised should be made available to the children in different languages.

During the reception of the prisoner at the prison, explanations are given on visits and regulations (in writing and orally by the director and the social worker). This is not done in different languages (French or Dutch, sometimes English). Another prisoner may be called in to translate or a member of staff may be called in if this is possible. Depending on the situation, the social worker contacts the family to explain the visiting arrangements. There is not really a specific document addressed to children. It needs to be improved.

As part of the classification or changes of the place of execution, an attempt is made to define a place of execution close to the social contacts. However, this my be due to capacity reasons or safety concerns and cannot always be guaranteed

Not applicable as we have only one prison. But we allocate inmates in blocks, many times following their requests to stay with their friends or relatives, given that their stay with them will not affect any security factors.

Pre-trial detainee is placed in a prison closest to the responsible Court. In case of prisoners with sentence, it is a goal to place them in the prison closest to their home. Needs of families are taken into consideration as much as possible.

Most prisoners are allocated to a prison in the region of the court but capacity issues preclude a place near home to all prisoners. Awareness of family is considered a factor in the decision but sometimes the need for capacity and/or security issues negate the voice of the child. As part of an awareness raising campaign managers will be advised regarding the content of recommendation 16

Most prisoners are allocated to a prison in the region of their home but capacity issues can limit the possibilities, i.e. for special regimes like high security prisons or penitentiary psychiatric centres. Awareness of family is considered a factor in the decision but sometimes the need for capacity and/or security issues negate the voice of the child.

Norway has a principle that an inmate must serve time in the vicinity of places of residence.

Whenever possible, prisoners are allocated to a prison unit also taking into account the opportunity to facilitate child-parent contact, relations and visits.

Prisoners are allocated a local establishment where possible and in line with sentence plan. There may be operating capacity considerations as well as prisoner behaviour and safety which prevent this.

Prisoners are allocated a local establishment where possible and in line with sentence plan. There may be operating capacity considerations as well as prisoner behaviour and safety which prevent this.

The SPPS do not apply proximity to children as a principle when the inmate is placed other principles concerning the inmate are above the child perspective for example capacity and security concern. No further change of policy, i t would not be possible due to current high occupancy.

Prisoners are allocated a local establishment where possible and in line with sentence plan. There may be operating capacity considerations as well as prisoner behaviour and safety which prevent this.

Prisoners are regularly accommodated close to home. If this is not possible due to the differentiation of the prison system, more intensive use should be made of visiting transfers. Financial support exists within the framework of social legislation. The responsibility also lies with the social ministries.

Security or other interests, such as overcrowding in some prisons, take precedence over the best interests of the child. Geographic travel can be more than 100 km away and can result in financial costs to the family. In certain circumstances, there is collaboration with the Red Cross and its "Itinérance” (Itinerancy) service. Volunteers provide transportation for some children placed in institutions or with foster families to ensure the link.

Prisoners can receive visits within the specified visiting times as often as a reasonable effort can be guaranteed. But at least, once a week for about half an hour. Within 6 weeks, the visit could be extended to one hour. The austrian penal system law stipulates that at least 4 weekdays of which one time in the evening or on the weekend the visiting times have to be set. Family visits allow a visit time of at least 3 hours to a maximum of 14 hours. There are long-term visits at many prisons, but the main conditions for an approval is a positive behavior of an inmate.

Each newly admitted inmate is allowed the first three visits from the very next day of his/her admission without a formal appointment for visit. So the children can visit their imprisoned parents from the next day. Normally, they are authorized for 10 visits monthly.

Pre-trial detainee is entitled to receive a visitor within 72 hours. According to the normal procedure, a detained person has the right for visitation 2*60 minutes/month. Frequency and length of visits vary according to the inmates’ regime classification. Light/Low regime: 2*90 min/month, medium and strict regime: 1*90 min/month. According to an inmate’s security classification these limits can differ +/-.

Remand prisoners have 3 x 30 minute visits weekly and sentenced prisoners have 2x30Minute visits per week. Family visits are allowed but on a behaviour of the prisoner basis only.

All prisoners have the right to receive visits 1 x 60 minutes weekly, children allowed. Special child-friendly visiting hour (called parent-child-detention days) 1 x 90 minutes monthly. Family visits in a special family room (if available) are allowed for sentenced prisoners on a behaviour of the prisoner basis. NGOs organize parent-child detention days based on the social contract

The process to visit usually takes longer than a week. Children are allowed to visit imprisoned parent on regular and frequent basis. Length of visit varies by type of prison and depending on various restrictions.

Yes, but currently suspended because of COVID restrictions The Prison Rules set out entitlements to visits during remand and once sentenced. Checks may be undertaken with social work services before a first visit for the wellbeing of the child. All visits sessions are child friendly. In addition, children’s specific visits are in place across the estate.

Remand prisoners and sentenced prisoners have 2 hours at least visit per mouth. Juvenile 1 hour per week at least. Mostly 5 persons including children, in case the prisoned person has more than four children, this restriction shall not apply his children. Prison governor can in reasoned cases allow receiving a visit more often or a visit of more persons.

Prisoners can receive visits within the specified visiting times so often that a reasonable effort can be guaranteed. t can vary but a visit once a week is not unusual. A permission for visit is based on an investigation that contact is not harmful for the child. A permission therefor be longer than one week.

The point is precisely formulated in its requirements and should be implemented in its wording in all correctional institutions. For better planning of the accompanying person, an early arrangement of appointments for future visits should be made possible. Responsibility also lies with the courts or public prosecutors' offices. In pre-trial detention, the responsibility for visitation arrangements generally lies with the custodial judge: If children are involved, decisions on visitation requests should be processed as a matter of priority.

Unless the judge decides otherwise, regular visits are possible from the day after incarceration. The rhythm of visits varies according to the status of the prisoner (accused or convicted) and the prison in which he or she is held (visits are possible every day for an accused person, minimum 3 times a week for a convicted person, including at least one day on weekends and Wednesdays). There are also family visits without supervision possible for a minimum of 2 hours at least once a month. Visits adapted for children and supervised are organized by external centers (ex Relais Enfant-Parent, on the French-speaking side of the country). The realities are different according to the prisons (sometimes it is only one collective visit per month, sometimes 2 visits per month, sometimes once a week). They are authorized in addition to regular visits.

The visiting time is determined by the head of a prison within the framework of the above-mentioned legal requirements. Therefore the visiting time could vary from prison to prison (e.g. more visiting times in the evening and on weekends) By the Directorate General for the Prison Service interventions of offering more family-friendly have been made. Partial successes have been achieved so that some prisons have extended their visiting times.

The visits are organized according to the needs of the family, and thus for the children. If there are barriers for children to visit their imprisoned parents due to school programs etc, arrangements for longer visits are made to facilitate greater interaction.

Visits can be carried out during afternoon hours or weekends.

Evening visits 5pm to 7pm are allowed

Visiting hours in weekends and if possible on Wednesday afternoons

Visits are arranged beyond regular visit times based on what is in the best interests of the child, as well as longer visits if someone comes from far away or other needs indicate this.

Yes but currently suspended because of COVID restrictions Children’s specific visits are available in evenings and at weekends . Accumulated and double visits can be arranged where possible

Sentenced prisoners have visits allowed on weekend adjusting the time of visits so that they are realized outside the time of school attendance,

The visiting times are determined by every unit and can therefore vary. Some offer more visiting times in the evening and on weekends than others. in some units special apartments are offered and the the family can stay overnight.

Visiting possibilities on different days of the week and at different times of the day are to be worked towards. They ensure that not only the school attendance mentioned as an example, but also other important appointments of the child are not impaired.

Swiss prisons in Geneva, Vaud and Fribourg organize monthly group visits for children and their parent in prison, with an evaluation of the best interest by the partner Ngo REPR, that supports children during the whole visit. Feedback about the needs and feelings of the children are brought back to the prison staff and the parents.

This varies greatly depending on the reality from one prison to another, but clearly improvements must be made in this regard. Material and human resources are often insufficient.

Not yet, but it is planned already Contact has been made already with the Vienna Family Association, which has been offering visits for many years also accompanied visits to imprisoned parents. The prison Wien-Simmering was selected as the pilot institute and the visits should have started in March 2020. Inmates, who could have made contact with their children as part of a dy pass under expert supervision of the Family Association, were selected already. Austria heard from Switherland via Cope that, in the chalet in front of the prison, as in many examples of visitor centers in several countries, there is a place and a time for children to pull up themselves after a visit before going back to their life.

We communicate the situation to welfare workers who work in prisons to make arrangements for alternative solutions that fall in their responsibility.

Social workers and Court appointed Guardians are there to help visitation of children.

Social workers and Court appointed Guardians currently bring children to see their fathers.

Once a month social workers and volunteers /NGOs drive children to prisons for a child-friendly visiting hour if the current caregiver is not available or cannot afford it. NGOs have chat possibilities for families and children, advicelines, workshop father-child to support fathers to learn about the child focus, individual support etc.

Social workers, a person from child welfare, a person church city mission, or relatives bring children to see their fathers.

SPS facilitates visits by children who are accompanied by social workers or other worker.

A person under the age of 15 may attend the visit only if accompanied by an adult

A child must be accompanied by an adult that is approved. that can also be someone from the social services or an NGO.

In the Chalet in front of the prison, as in many examples of visitors centres in several countries, there is a place and a time for children to pull themselves after a visit before going back to their life.

The implementation of this recommendation is not the responsibility of the prison. The prison system provides support in identifying and contacting competent organisations. The responsibility lies with the social and family ministries and, if necessary, with civil society organisations.

There is a collaboration with the Red Cross and its "Itinérance” (Itinerancy) service. Volunteers provide transportation for some children.

Last year, the head of the prisons were asked to take pictures of the visitor zones. Based on the feedback, it turned out that almost all of the prisons have their own children's area, equipped with books, toys and painting utilities. Some prisons have renewed their play area in the course of the survey. Abook package (books dealing with the problems of children of imprisoned parents) was also ordered for all prisons for the visitor zone.

The visiting areas are organized as described in the article.

During family visits, “child’s corner” – playing are created in visiting rooms.

Visitor centre located at each closed prison. Community visits also occur with appropriate community partners. Play areas provided in the waiting area and in the prison visits.

Visitor centre located at each closed prison. Play areas provided in the waiting area and in the prison visits. In some prisons there are special family rooms for informal parent-child contact, with possibilities to play or make homework together. Special family rooms in more prisons are foreseen.

Yes, with the observation of the sanitary regulations imposed by COVID-19 situation Special spaces for organizing the visits with minors have been rehabilitated and endowed accordingly in 38 prisons. Visits can be unfolded all day long.

All visit rooms are child friendly. Changing facilities are available. Scottish prisons offer Visiting Centre facilities where families can meet with prison employees and volunteer workers and receive information on matters relating to imprisonment. Family Strategy groups have oversight of the availability of play and learning materials. More needs to be done to ensure supplies of age appropriate toys etc. The visits in the Open Conditions prison take place in a comfortable space on site that has a café Barista environment. All visit rooms are child friendly. Changing facilities are available. Family Strategy groups have oversight of the availability of play and learning materials. More needs to be done to ensure supplies of age appropriate toys etc. The visits in the Open Conditions prison take place in a comfortable space on site that has a café Barista environment.

Visiting zones are in every prison and include waiting rooms and children's corners or play areas. legislatively regulate the minimum equipment of waiting rooms

Possible on all units. Swedish and Swiss children groups has been asked a wish list for their visits and these lists have been transmitted to the local authorities

It is enshrined in the Execution of Sentences Act that the prison shall create the conditions for visits by children to be carried out in a gentle manner. The guidelines state that child visits must be carried out in child-friendly visiting rooms or other suitable premises, among other things there should be offers of toys / games adapted to different age levels.

The visiting and, where appropriate, waiting areas of correctional facilities must be designed in a child-friendly manner. The information materials already available or to be acquired in accordance with Recommendation No. 15 must be made available in these areas. Visits in the vicinity of the detention facility shall be made possible within the framework of measures to open up the prison. Children's chairs, special visiting rooms for parent-child encounters with play boxes. In the family visit room there are instant cameras and children are given a photo with the father (because usually there are no other pictures of the father for the years of imprisonment).

Visits always take place inside the establishment. Many initiatives exist to make these visits as less as traumatic as possible for the child (signposted routes with animals for example, areas dedicated to children in the waiting rooms and visiting rooms, equipped play areas, board games available, etc.).

If the visits are not supervised there are taking place in privat visiting rooms. The staff can ask about the visit on the way out and make sure that the contact is in the best interest of the child.

The recommendation has already been implemented with regard to respect for the dignity of the child. Prisons should design the framework conditions and organisational procedures for visits in such a way as to facilitate visits and access to the prison, especially for children with impairments and special needs. Visiting rooms that are furnished and designed in a child-friendly manner offer the opportunity to respect the dignity of the child and his or her right to privacy in a particularly suitable manner, as well as to strengthen the intimacy of the family and an undisturbed relationship. Special children's visiting rooms for family visits. Child-friendly equipment in the visiting rooms (play corner, children's furniture, baby chairs) as well as in the sanitary rooms (toilet seat and a kick for small children and disinfection material)

Almost all prisons have disabled access to the visitor zones

In Belgium the website of the Federal Public Service of Justice is accessible to people with a disability. It obtained an Any Surfer Label, a quality label for accessible websites

Measures taken and procedures always facilitate the access and visits according to the needs of the child as well as for the children with special needs In Croatia, prison staff help guests with special needs, adapting the environment to allow for accessible prison visits or cooperating with the Association of Deaf and Blind when necessary

Each and every prison institute has a child friendly visiting room, or an area created for this purpose.

The prison is cognisant of special needs requirements in general.

The prison is cognisant of special needs requirements in general. For children with special needs arrangements are made incidentally.

The visit context are build in a child-friendly manner. Facilitating access and visits for children with special needs is in new prison organized in accordance with the general standards. In older prison, there are shortcomings in the visiting facilities for eg. wheelchair users. In Norway, some prisons have their own visitorhouse/apartments that are adapted to stays with children and young people with accommodation. They are also adapted for disabled children and adults.

FCOs are the first point of contact where special needs require to be considered and addressed Training for staff on learning difficulties and disabilities awareness is to be rolled out to all SPS staff.

Almost all prisons have disabled access to the visitor zones and of course the prison is cognisant of special needs requirements in general.

See article 18 about special apartments, they can also be used for longer day visits.

In order to be able to actively inform visitors about the possibilities of flexible visitation, prison staff should be able to inform visitors as well as prisoners about this.

Family visits can last from 3 till 14 hours and must be requested by the occupant. There is also the option of being transferred to another prison for 1 to 2 weeks as a passerby in order to receive a visit. However, this depends on the general capacity of the prisons and is therefore not always possible.

Arrangements are made for those who live in other districts away from prisons and for those who live abroad and they wish to visit their imprisoned relatives and friends.

Visiting hours of one month can be combined.

In these circumstances prisoner are allowed to book extra visiting slots to enable longer visits.

In these circumstances prisoner are allowed to book extra visiting slots to enable longer visits.

In these circumstances prisoner are allowed to book extra visiting slots to enable longer visits.

In these circumstances prisoner are allowed to book extra visiting slots to enable longer visits.

Accumulated visits are available; Virtual Visits had been taking place in some areas (Aberdeen & Inverness), but these are now in place in all establishments following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic

Concern is taken to the child and hand detector with toys can be used.

Disrobing and body cavity searches are generally not carried out in Germany. A child-friendly approach within the framework of security checks must be ensured. This requires the training and sensitisation of the staff responsible for this. It makes sense for the family members to involve independent institutions to plan, organise and extend the visiting situation.

Security Screening and security checks on children are being carried out in a child-friendly manner. Body cavity searches is prohibited.

Security checks are carried out by trained staff in a very child-friendly manner.

The Hungarian Prison Code (Act CCXL/2013) regulates – with details – the security measures to be taken. It puts great emphasis on a child’s dignity and right to privacy.

IPS policy on Security Screening reflects this.

Search is allowed by a person of the same sexe and with respect for the child.

N/A

Security Screening reflects this but is not regulated

Searches on children are light touch and carried out with respect for a child’s dignity.

Security check is not in front of the child.

Taking into account the safety aspects, it should be examined with regard to the recommendation how the organisational procedures for ending visits can be adapted. In the context of training, the responsible staff should also be made aware of what kind of (private) clothing (e.g. skulls and horror symbols, slogans, etc.) - is not appropriate for children.

N/A

We apply fully the provisions of art.24

The articles of Prison Code on clothing do take into consideration the preservation of dignity. No searched of prisoners are carried out in front of visitors.

IPS clothing policy reflect the dignity of the prisoner and searches are not carried out in front of visitors.

Clothing policy reflect the dignity of the prisoner and searches are not carried out in front of visitors. If possible prisoners can take a shower before receiving visitors.

Same as Ireland

In the prison system units, inmates wear only civil outfits and not a uniform imposed by the penitentiary administration.

Clothing policy reflect the dignity of the prisoner and searches are not carried out in front of visitors.

Rub down search takes place when leaving residential area. Clothing is suitable and does not offend dignity. Family Strategy groups raising the matter of visitors exiting before prisoners, security permitting.

Free phone calls once a week is offered although the inmate can call on their expense more often. Video calls (skype) are offered but how often vary on different units

For the development of relationships between children and their imprisoned parents, personal contact should be promoted as a matter of priority. Prisons should provide information and communication technology services to supplement visitation contacts. The necessity of communication between parents and children generally justifies the assumption of costs in case of need. Germany provides in some federal states (Laender) free video telephony as an alternative or to complement personal visits. Multifunctional devices (detention room media system) in detention rooms.

The video conference technology has been massively increased in the last months in order to enable visual contact despite the visitors restrictions.

Article 25 is fully implemented. The costs for phone calls is on the inmate. However, we provide telecards to inmates who have financial scarcity. There is no cost on inmate for other alternative means of communication like video conferencing

Possibility of video calls is available for prisoners. This does not count as face-to-face visit, not does it lower the allowed timeframe.

Video conference visits are used but mostly for foreign national prisoner and inter prison visits. In Northern Ireland, prisoners at HMP Magilligan are allowed access to Skype to keep in contact with their family; initiatives for Skype contact are currently being developed in the Czech Republic and Norway , and imprisoned individuals in Cyprus’s prison are allowed full access to Skype for prolonged parts of the day; There is scope to expand the ICT offering in Prisons to enhance family contact. Policy issue re phone calls and timings of the call re supporting families. This is under discussion.

Skype video calls are used as visits but mostly for foreign national prisoners and inter prison visits, and during the corona crisis on a regular basis.Skype is possible in most prisons 1x weekly. NGOs have chatpossibilities with families and children

IPADs are used for familes and the children have first priority. In Norway, 800 IPADs have been purchased that function as a videophone and which the prisoner can call their children from their cell. The scheme is regulated as an uncontrolled visit by family. The scheme is in addition to ordinary visits

According to the legislation in force, inmates have the right to benefit on-line conversations with the family members, including with the children who are at a distance from the detention unit. Phone calls can be made with no restrictions, the units having phones placed in areas accessible for the incarcerated persons.

Skype video calls began to be used as visits during the corona crisis. Skype is possible in all prisons 20 min. per month.

In Switzerland, REPR provided a “Guide for Skype with Children from prison” to all prisons working with this type of technology, also available for all families.

As above - virtual visits now in place at no cost to individual Phone calls initiated by prisoners. Costs kept as low as possible

With few exceptions, each prisoner has a telephone in his cell to ensure contact with his relatives. However, he must bear the cost himself. The prisoner can call upon various support services to contact his children if he cannot afford to do so. Prisoners with no income and no financial resources can also receive material financial assistance (amounts vary from prison to prison). Since the COVID 19 health crisis, virtual visits have been organized (at least 20 minutes per week but each prison offers different services according to its reality).

Free phone calls once a week is offered although the inmate can call on their expense more often. Video calls (skype) are offered but how often vary on different units. In Sweden, following acceptance of an application, prisoners are allowed fifteen minutes of free calls with an extra five minutes per child each week

Telephony and other technical means of communication facilitate the children's contact with their imprisoned parent. Efforts should be made to create these possibilities in all prisons. To this end, structural and information technology changes are necessary in the prisons in order to create a communication solution that is independent of time - also on the initiative of the children - for example by setting up detention room telephony systems.

At this point of time, for children it is not possible to initiate telephone calls with their imprisoned parents. So far, no solution has been considered.

Inmates have unlimited access to phone calls between 0800 – 2030 hours, daily. Thus, they can contact their children daily during this period of time as many times as they wish.

Access to telephone is uni-lateral: only the inmate can start the outgoing call through the cell-phone equipped with security system. Change of current legislation is necessary

Telephone access is one way and initiated by the prisoner on a secure system. A pilot program allowing incoming calls is underway in the IPS. This would address this recommendation.

Telephone access is one way and initiated by the prisoner on a secure system. In all prisons a digital post service is available (besides normal postservice): children can sent a message to their imprisoned parent any time.

Telephone access is one way and initiated by the inmates who call their children according to the telephone time per week. The children can also call in, but then they must call through the guard center and the prison officer must ask the inmate to call again. However, it is possible to call the child coordinator directly.

Telephone access is one way and initiated by the prisoner on a secure system. Children can not call in.

Top up pin phones can be requested. Family can request prisoners to make contact Children cannot call into a prison.

It is impossible for a child to initiate telephone communication with an incarcerated parent. Cell phones cannot be reached from outside the prison. It is always the prisoner who must initiate the contact.

Communication with the school or other services can be arranged if needed but it is on the inmates responsibility

The prisons should provide offers of moderation, mediation, accompaniment and support for imprisoned parents to exercise their participation in parental care for the benefit of the child. If necessary, structural conditions should be created to involve youth welfare authorities and/or independent agencies. The responsibility also lies with the social and family ministries and, if necessary, with civil society organisations.

The communication with the school or (social and health) services is generally the responsibility of that person, who has custody of the child(ren). There is no concrete plan yet.

We make all the necessary arrangements for the effective participation of the imprisoned parent in the parenting of his/her child, when it is in the best interest of the child.

With the inclusion of prison-psychologist, inmates have the possibility to do so, during “family – decision making group programmes

Social Workers have access to prisoners who wish to discuss their children. Prisoners are brought to family law cases when appropriate.

In all prisons there are training courses ‘My child and I’ and especially for detained mothers also the licensed training ‘Better Start”. A specific project called Family Approach started in two prisons to stimulate imprisoned fathers to take their role as a father seriously and to improve their educational skills. Motivated fathers are placed in a special ‘father’s wing’ where they have a special day programme with many facilities to participate in the parenting of their children. A handbook is made to implement the working method of the family approach in other prisons.

Social Workers have access to prisoners who wish to discuss their children. Prisoners are brought to family law cases when appropriate

In normal circumstances parenting programmes exist as per Article 41; Family Contact Officers are available to provide support in contact and any issues Top up pin phones can be requested; Telephone calls are reasonably priced for communication. A process is in place to add and remove telephone numbers for calls Children’s events normally take place each year.

A variety of support or mentoring services for inmates offer such arrangements. However, these offers are insufficient. Sometimes there are long waiting times for care.

No, there are no special arrangements these days.

Individual family-related occasions are to be actively supported and already existing visit opportunities are to be exhausted. A pleasant visiting atmosphere should be created, which contributes to a stabilisation of the contact experience. A friendly design of the visiting rooms and relaxed service dress regulations for the visiting service on these occasions can contribute to a conducive climate. It is also desirable that visiting opportunities also exist on selected public and religious holidays. Family days, parent-child days and summer parties are often organized in Germany’s prisons. Some offer also special afternoons and Christmas parties without uniforms. Germany’s prisons hold special events for prisoners and their children such as: Christmas baking in the prison bakery, puppet theatre, magic shows, etc

Not generally, but in individual cases In some prisons (Wien-simmering), there are occasional efforts to arrange parent-child visits but which do not take place regularly due to capacity reasons. project from the prison “sonnberg”: “I will read a story for you”: fathers read stories and record them on video, the videos are e.g. sent for Christmas or her birthday project from the prison “Wien-Josefstadt”: gifts for small children were bought through the psychological service and the mothers were able to present these gifts for christmas

In addition to extended prison visits on special occasions like Christmas time, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Children’s Day, we organize events for activities with the children with their imprisoned parents. Further, we organize other events during the year for strengthening the child-parent bond, in cases where possible we allow home leaves during special occasions etc.

When issuing the visiting permission, officers take into consideration the special occasions (for women the Mothers day, international women’s day family visits are allowed). These visits are counted in the legal timeframe

Not specifically at present This can be done through the prison community based Red Cross where family days are already a feature for graduations of course participants.

On special occasions like the monthly parent-child-detention days, events like mother/father days, Sinterklaas (Santa) and Christmas the atmosphere is informal, although for security reasons staff must be recognized as staff (in case of disasters or mistaken identities), especially in bigger events.

Children are given high priority on the visit list and visits are granted according to capacity. If leave is not possible then prisons (according to various restrictions) arrange for extra visits in connection with anniversaries, especially the child's own birthday, but also other celebrations and important days.

Specific activities involving the interaction between children and parents in custody are organized for various events (June 1st, March 8th, Christmas etc.). The prison institutions have concluded partnerships with nongovernmental organizations/foundations/associations whose activity consists of providing support both to the persons in custody and to the children experiencing difficult existential moments (children with parents in detention being included in this category). Examples: - Christian Men Association has unfolded A day with father/ A day with mother projects aiming at strengthening and maintaining the relationship with the family with a view to decreasing the potential negative effects of incarceration both upon the persons incarcerated by the prison system and their family members, especially upon the children; - SVASTA Foundation – Close to you on the way to school which involved providing scholarships to the children whose parents were in detention (during 2015-2019, 348 scholarships offered to the children); - Save the Children Organization – collaboration aiming at reviewing the programme for developing parental abilities – My child and I; - Terre des Hommes is currently unfolding PRECISION Project, whose beneficiaries are the children coming from the protection system and who are deprived of liberty.

not allowed, visit intervals are set by law

Relais Enfants Parents offers special visits for children on Mother’s Day, Father’s Day and Christmas in French prisons;

Events take place as laid down in the family strategy; Children specific visits are available; Parenting courses as per Article 41; Staff uniform issues only to be considered at special events.

External services (such as the Relais Enfant-Parent) in some prisons organize special visits for Father's Day, Mother's Day, St. Nicholas, Easter, etc. Some of these visits are supervised only by staff from these services and are therefore dressed in civilian clothes and not in uniform.

Not from the inmates cell but the website with special information for children, show pictures from places in prison. But no personal pictures

Without child-friendly education, children tend to imagine their parents' living conditions in prison to be worse than they really are. If they are given information in a sensitive way, their fears and worries can be reduced.1 Visual aids and child-friendly information should be available to give children of detainees an impression of their parent's daily life in prison. In suitable settings, children can exceptionally gain insights into the parent's living environment.

However, it is planned to create a folder for children who come for a visit to a prison the first time. This folder could contain exemplary pictures of the cells, other prisoners rooms and daily prison life. This could provide children of imprisoned parents an insight into prison life.

It does not happen often, but yes it did happen several times. Female inmates can spend time with their children on Mother’s day in block and outdoor area of female inmates. Indeed, it proved that had a positive impact and effect on their children as they visited their mothers and had the whole day with them; they saw how and where their mums spend their day and where they sleep; they had lunch with them and later on sweets, spending quality time by playing games, karaoke, danced, and any other activities they wished. Similar activities took place in the male areas (foodball grounds, garden areas, theatre area etc.) but the children did not visit the cells of their fathers. We had only one request from inmate for such visit and we involved the MHServices who advised that this visit and time with his father will have a positive effect on the child. And indeed, it had positive impact on the child this visit. In all such events, there was positive effect on children, but at the end of the events they get emotional and they want to stay with their imprisoned parents (ages from 1- 12).

Current security regulations do not allow to do so.

This should be included as part of the communication pillar for the local leads on Family interventions.

As part of the family approach it is occasionally possible for children to visit areas in which their imprisoned father spends time, including the prison cell. A virtual tour is given in special information films for children.

Arrangements are made for, and encouraged contact between the inmate and child. In addition, family day, father and children activities are organized as part of the rehabilitation program.

Not regulated by current legislation we are considering publishing an information brochure

No visits to rooms. Local Induction processes are in place; Family Strategy groups are developing booklets across all establishments.

Improvements need to be made in this regard in a more structural way. There are only a few local initiatives.

The SPPS policy is to allow not to restrict children’s access to parents. If it is restricted it is because contact is not in the best interest for the child or their may be security concerns.

Specific measures to strengthen the competence and motivation of imprisoned parents to fulfil their role and tasks in the relationship with their children must be provided. If necessary, these should be actively offered to the prisoners in motivational individual talks and anchored in the prison planning. Parents in prison should be encouraged to fulfil their role and tasks as far as possible. When deciding on sanctions, the child's right to contact should be taken into account. If possible, sanctions that restrict contact with the child should be interrupted or avoided. Some Laender in Germany offer weekend excursions, week seminars, guided parent discussion groups, guided parent-child groups, father-child-seminars, communal and social-spatial standard offer of family support and parental education. Instructed handling of new media, online games and social networks by parents and children have been installed as well as preparation and follow-up of visits of family groups, workshop series for mothers/fathers to prepare for parenting skills. There is also a prison which offers a project to strengthen the parent-child competence of radicalized parents

Family visits, also other privileges of prisoners, are close connected to the behavior. Negative behavior of an inmate usually could lead to restrictions of contact with relatives. A discussion with the head of the prisons and decision makers seems to be required.

Art.30 is fully applied and only in exceptional cases the visits are screened face-to-face. In 6 year-time it happened only once, for a male inmate to have a two-week screened visit (physical visit without physical contact) for security reasons.

Current security regulations allow contact between parents and their children. Limitations of contact is allowed only by the decision of the relevant authority, or in case of security issues, by the decision of the prison governor.

IPS policy is to allow not to restrict children’s access to parents

It is policy not to restrict children’s access to parents but to encourage the contact between imprisoned parents and their children.

Slovak prison system policy is to allow not to restrict children’s access to parents but restrictions on contact between prisoners and their children shall be applied in the same way as to other people

Swiss prisons in Geneva, Vaud and Fribourg organize with the NGO REPR summer holiday special visit and Christmas visits

Loss of access to visits is not part of the sanctions for prisoner behaviour. Closed visit policy in place and review periods are case by case.

If it is not harmful for the child visits or phone calls may be allowed.

If it is necessary to restrict outside contact for reasons of safety and order, a special examination is required as to how (e.g. also professionally accompanied visits without other relatives, video telephony, special telephone calls) the children's right of contact can be guaranteed.

The massive development of using video conference technology during the corona crisis could also be adopted in case of security concerns

For disciplinary penalties we have the policy to impose other penalties than confinement. Only in exceptional cases for serious disciplinary offences like escape we impose confinement, but even during that period every 10 days, the inmate has the right for one visit face-to-face and 1 phone call. This happened once. In other cases we impose other disciplinary penalties which do not deprive the visits.

Limitation of contact can be imposed only as the strictest disciplinary punishment/sanction, for the duration of solidary confinement. In case of using any other disciplinary sanction, contact is not limited.

It is policy to allow another adult to bring the child on a normal visit where a screened visit sanction has been imposed on a visitor. The prisoner’s responsibility not to subvert access to his child is also a consideration here.

It is policy to allow another adult to bring the child on a normal visit where a screened visit sanction has been imposed on a visitor. The prisoner’s responsibility not to subvert access to his child is also a consideration here.

Inmates can Skype with the kids. In general, inmates can apply for additional extra phone time when they have children. All measures are related to the child's best interests, their wishes and needs.

the visit during the disciplinary punishments is carried out without direct contact

Children’s visits support this process Closed visit policy.

While release planning is in place the main focus is on the safe reintegration of the prisoner to society although children can be considered in the planning of the temporary release

The legal prerequisites for implementation are in place nationwide and should also be exhausted in practice to strengthen the parental role.

Either as part of probation ordered by the judge or as an optional offer of the Verein Neustart (probation service). Since about 10 years, there is also the opportunity for inmates to participate in so-called release groups inside the prisons.

During special events as provided by Law, the inmate can attend significant family events, with a home leave or a transfer with or without escort, depending on several factors according to the relevant regulations.

Prior to release, the prison might grant the right of prison-leave upon official request, but when assessing this possibility, the most important factor is the goal of reintegration (aid of finances, accommodation, healthcare, etc.)

While release planning is in place the focus is on the safe reintegration of the prisoner to society in general terms i.e. Financial, housing and medical needs. The release policy needs to include a reference to family reintegration to include the voice of the child. The Family Liaison Officer is the required resource here.

While release planning is in place the focus is on the safe reintegration of the prisoner to society in general terms i.e. financial, housing and medical needs. Besides working on a stable family contact and a supporting social network are important factors of safe reintegration.

Same as Ireland

Governor can due to an urgent family reason, mainly in case of decease of a close person or birth of a child, permit the prisoners a prison leave up to five days

Opportunities for Special escorted Leave (SEL’s), Unescorted Leave (UEL’s) or Home leave are all considered from National Top End facilities and the Open Estate as part of progression towards release.

Child training is given to all staff both basic and special training for some staff.

Staff, visitors and prisoners are aware of their role model function towards children in behaviour and interaction. The guiding principles of the facilities should focus on the well-being of the children. Positive interaction with each other should be the culture of the institution. The implementation must start with the staff (education and training) as well as with the prisoners (treatment measures). The temporary presence of children in prisons can make an additional contribution to security and order in the prison as well as to the resocialisation of prisoners, especially those with children.

Yes partly but it always depends on the involved people and whether there is a positive atmosphere in the prisonIn order to create a stable, friendly and positive atmosphere in prisons as well as having the conviction of the importance of these measures, specialised trainings for prison staff should be institutionalised.

The past 6 years we invest a lot in staff training , as a learning organisation, targeting on dynamic security, and in creating a learning environment in prisons for staff and inmates, so as to ensure the well-being of the inmates and of their children, and in building positive staff-inmate relationships.

A Code of conduct (~Code of Ethics) has been issued to make sure that the staff members participating in guarding the imprisoned people is carrying out their work in a responsible, ethical manner with following the values and norms.

Child protection training is provide to all operational prison staff. A reporting mechanism is in place where Child safety issues can be raised with a Designated Liaison Person.

Child protection training is provide to all operational prison staff. A reporting mechanism is in place where Child safety issues can be raised with a Designated Liaison Person.

The Prison and Probation Service's policy is that all inmates, children, relatives etc should meet with respect and dignity. All units have a child coordinator who is also responsible for ensuring that children's encounters with prison are as good as possible.

Treatment of prisoners is a complex of activities the purpose of which is to ensure the exercise of rights and duties according to Act in a differentiated way, support and develop the sense for responsibility, abiding laws and social norms, positive personal characteristics, respect to others, self-respect and positive relation to family.

New child protection policy in place 2019; New eLearning package being developed for all staff with SPS College; Visit rooms maintain a friendly atmosphere.

The issue of dynamic security is a central concern and is a course of action expected by all hierarchical authorities.

SPPS is compliant with this recommendation

All prisoners in prison have a right to necessary, sufficient and appropriate medical care, oriented to the benefits of the statutory health insurance; this also includes benefits in case of pregnancy and maternity. Childbirth outside the prison and the renunciation of coercive means during childbirth is the prison standard. Children receive the medical care they need in hospital and in prison. As a rule, cultural particularities are taken into account as far as possible. The responsibility lies equally with the health ministries.

In accordance to the principle of equivalence, health care is guaranteed for all inmates the same way as for people in liberty. There are particular mother-child-departments in some prisons.

Article 34 is fully implemented as described in the content of the article.

Regulations of the Prison Code are in accordance with this Rec.

IPS is compliant with this recommendation

The Dutch Prison service (DJI) is compliant with this recommendation

NAP fully applies the recommendation in this article.

SPS is compliant with this recommedation

GMA that stipulates no handcuffing.

A close collaboration is set up between the women's neighborhoods that take in babies and the ONE (Office National de l'Enfance). Each pregnant mother receives close medical care and multidisciplinary monitoring from the ONE as soon as she arrives at the prison. Pregnant moms as well as moms and their babies stay in neighborhoods adapted to their specific needs. The cells are also specifically arranged.

SPPS is compliant with this recommendation

The notification of a child to the registry office is carried out according to the legal basis or the respective execution business regulations without reference to the detention of the mother.

N/A

The issuing of the birth certificate fall in the competence of another Governmental Department. Prisons help the imprisoned mother to register her new-born child.

Regulations of the Prison Code are in accordance with this Rec.

IPS is compliant with this recommendation.

DJI is compliant with this recommendation.

Birth is given in a hospital outside the detention place and the birth certificates have no mentions about the mother being an inmate

In SPS we have not unit of mothers with children at all

New Mother & Baby Policy now in place; No address on the birth certificate is identifiable as a prison.

SPPS is compliant with this recommendation.

The guarantee of the best interests of the child when a child is placed in a correctional institution is implemented in principle by involving the competent youth welfare office and, if necessary, the consent of the person or persons entitled to determine the child's place of residence. Children who live with their imprisoned parent in a correctional institution are not treated as prisoners; care is taken to ensure an environment suitable for young children. Their development is promoted according to the guidelines of youth welfare.Likewise, the responsibility lies with the social and family ministries.

If its the benefit of the child, it can stay with their mothers in particular mother-child-departements up to the age of 3 years.

According to the Law, the Director may permit an infant of a female inmate to stay with her new-born child in prisons for as long as the breast feeding lasts and following the Medical officer’s instructions. The stay may be extended for 1 year. The extension of stay of the infant more than one or two years, this can be approved only with a court decision. All the costs for the baby and its stay in prisons burdens prison budget

Regulations of the Prison Code are in accordance with this Rec.

IPS is compliant with this recommendation. The infant stays with the mother for at least a year. (TBC)

DJI is compliant with this recommendation. The infant stays with the mother for 6 months and in exceptional cases 9 months. In one special half-open prison for women it is possible for children to stay with their mother up to the age 4 of which 1 year on a row maximum

There are specially dedicated prison wings for females who can raise their up to one-year-old children in case their parental rights have not been revoked.

In SPS we have not unit of mothers with children at all

Mother & Baby Policy now in place is in line with this recommendation

Decisions regarding the child's continued contact with the incarcerated mother are made in close collaboration between management and the ONE, as well as Youth Services where appropriate. A program is established for the child to attend an external group setting such as a daycare center, school or to spend his or her days in his or her home environment outside. The mother keeps her cell door open all day long and can thus have access with her child to a collective space where there are games (the nursery), to the kitchen to prepare her child's meals and to the outdoor playground.

Where the child stays with the mother the SPPS is compliant with this recommendation.

If children are accommodated in the prison with their imprisoned parent, care is taken to ensure a safe environment suitable for children and to promote the development of the children through the involvement of professionals. As a rule, this is ensured by an operating licence in accordance with § 46 SGB VIII. Regular contact with the family and caregivers as well as child-oriented offers and services outside the prison is guaranteed.Furthermore, the involvement of the health departments appears to be appropriate.

Austrias single prison for women has a kindergarten which children from prisoners and staff use together. As already mentioned above, health care is guaranteed according to the principle of equivalence.

Article 37 is fully implemented

Regulations of the Prison Code are in accordance with this Rec.

Where the child stays with the mother the IPS is compliant with this recommendation.

Where the child stays with the mother the DJI is compliant with this recommendation

The specially female prison wings provide the necessary conditions for mothers to be together with the child, benefiting from appropriate endowments: baby beds, kitchenette equipped for preparing the food, giving a bath etc.

In SPS we have not unit of mothers with children at all

Mother & Baby Policy now in place is in line with this recommendation

See article 36

SPPS is compliant with this recommendation

The decision whether to separate a child from the parent in custody is made on a case-by-case basis with the involvement of the youth welfare office. The social and family departments are also involved.

n/a

Please see comment for art.36

According to the Prison Code, mother and child can be placed together until the child reaches 1 year of age. Separation before time is carried out only after an individual analysis

IPS is compliant with this recommendation

DJI is compliant with this recommendation

In SPS we have not unit of mothers with children at all

Mother and Baby Units and Mother & Baby Case Conferences in place; National Mother & Baby Policy in place is in line with this recommendation

SPPS is compliant with this recommendation.

Implementation is ensured by the concepts of the mother-child facilities. For a sensitive transition, the respective living situation of the child outside of the correctional facility is planned as comprehensively and as long-term as possible with the involvement of the youth welfare office. At the request of the prisoners, the respective consulate is involved if necessary. The social and family departments are also responsible.

In case of foreign prisoners, the embassy is activated to make appropriate arrangements and handover.

Please see my comment for art. 36. In addition, for foreign nationals, we are in consular consultation only following a written request (consent) of the imprisoned parent.

Regulations of the Prison Code are in accordance with this Rec.

IPS is compliant with this recommendation.

DJI is compliant with this recommendation.

In SPS we have not unit of mothers with children at all

Mother and Baby Units and Mother & Baby Case Conferences in place; Mother & Baby Policy is in line with this recommendation.

In SPS we have not unit of mothers with children at all

After the separation of a child from the imprisoned parent, the most frequent and flexible visitation possibilities possible are to be ensured in order to be able to continue to maintain family contact, taking into account the best interests of the child. The social and family departments are also addressed.

As far as possible, an attempt will be made to give the opportunity of the use all the visit options.

We work these issues with the welfare services that they decide where to place the child, and from our side we facilitate all the meetings of the child with its imprisoned parent, as described in art. 40.

Regulations of the Prison Code are in accordance with this Rec.

IPS is compliant with this recommendation

DJI is compliant with this recommendation.

According to the legal proceedings, the persons in custody can be visited by the children, upon the condition the courts of law have not issued any related constraints

"Mother and Baby Units and Mother & Baby Case Conferences in place; Mother & Baby Policy in place is in line with this recommendation"

During the sentence the children of the inmates are considered as for contact and family support f.ex in prison it is possible to attend a parent program. Release planning happens but not specifically for family reasons although it is considered.

A comprehensive recording of family data (cf. recommendation no. 13), in particular on the children, is a necessary prerequisite for an appropriate assessment of the need for measures and the determination of necessary treatment measures in the correctional plan. The parent-child relationship is to be taken into account in the correctional planning. The current state of the parent-child relationship and the need for support to strengthen the bond must be examined and included in the sentence planning, taking into account the best interests of the child. This also applies in particular to preparation for release, which should, if possible, include a trial of cohabitation within the framework of measures to open up the prison system. The existing forms and standards are to be supplemented with this information if necessary.

"Yes but only in individual cases Once there was a father-training in the prison Graz-Karlau and the association “Männerberatung” offers faather training for fathers in custody with the aim of developing a positive father identity, in the prison Sonnberg video messages from fathers were recorded and sent to their children. Actually, there is an ongoing group for fathers in the prison Garsten. However, these measures are selective and not in an institutionalized framework. Austria obtained information from Germany about the institute for Gender Reflected Violence Prevention, which offers training for parent coaching in prisons, called “Präfix R Coaching”. The target group are fathers and mothers in custody who deal with their parenting role and want to reflect on questions of upbringing. To offer low-threshold training for fathers and mothers in all prisons to support a positive parent-child relationship."

The Croatian Ombudsman’s Office team regularly visits prisons to monitor visiting facilities for children and to meet with prison staff.

Art.41 is fully implemented. MHServices and Prison School Coordinator is involved

Relais Enfants Parents France and the Italian association Bambinisenzasbarre run support groups for imprisoned mothers and fathers. These information groups are staffed by psychologists, judges, social workers and representatives of institutions to raise awareness on the different aspects of the child-parent relationship and parental roles. The groups also help reinforce parenting skills.

Regulations of the Prison Code are in accordance with this Rec.

Yes release planning happens but not specifically for family reasons Community Return and Community support schemes exist and are successful in terms of managing the safe reintegration of offenders into society. Safe reintegration in to the family also needs to be considered here.

Release planning and preparation for release is an important issue in the cooperation between NGOs and prison services as part of the communication and community engagement pillar. Safe reintegration in to the family is considered here as one of the aspects. All prisons offer training courses to improve educational skills.

Norway prisons offer a program called “Daddy in prison” where detainees, in groups where they undergo a parental guidance program. In addition, the state has created a national strategy for parental support that will in turn provide safe children in safe communities.

The recuperative intervention on inmates includes special programmes on developing parental abilities and improving the relationship with the support environment (e.g. Education for the family life, Parental education, Parental rights and responsibilities, Matrimonial and family relationships).

The recuperative intervention on inmates includes special programmes on developing parental abilities and improving the relationship with the support environment (e.g. Education for the family life, Parental education, Parental rights and responsibilities, Matrimonial and family relationships).

In Spain, the NGO Niños sin Barreras offers legal workshops which cover the law as it relates to the parenting function and the rights of the child, including input from jurists.

In Geneva’s prison in Switzerland, Parental support groups on the Swedish BUFFF model are ran by the NGO REPR. It is as in Sweden always child focused, the voice of the child is in the center of the training for parents.

Parenting Programmes: A variety of parenting programmes normallyy taks place across the estate. Seven establishments engage with Early Years Scotland (EYS), delivering a range of programmes (see below). HMP & YOI Polmont have parenting courses delivered by Barnardo's; HMP & YOI Cornton Vale have parenting delivery through an Aberlour worker; HMP Shotts have Solihull parenting approach; HMP Glenochil have run 7 Habits parenting course on occasions and HMP Perth have Family Learning/Fun Club taking place.

Improvements and efforts need to be made. There is not enough support for parenting, not in a systematic or structural way.

Yes all of these options exist but are not used specifically for family reasons. Although is children considered in the planning and especially that their are not victims of the inmate.

The legal regulations on measures to open up the prison system must be fully utilised with the aim of maintaining and strengthening contact with the children during detention as well as facilitating the transition from detention to freedom. Stronger networking with external services (youth welfare offices, districts, municipalities, agencies, etc.) is necessary.

Particularly in the area of electronic monitoring, the head of the prisons are asked generously to examine and grant this possibility

All prisoners can benefit from home leaves and transfers, from open prison and reintegration center, from the use of electronic monitoring, and from an early release depending on the special circumstances of the baby.

Prior to release, the prison might grant the right of prison-leave upon official request, but when assessing this possibility, the most important factor is the goal of reintegration (aid of finances, accommodation, healthcare, etc.) Change of current legislation is necessary, strengthening relationships and contact between inmates and their children shall be incorporated into the legislative environment

Yes, all of these options exist but are not used specifically for family reasons Greater cooperation with community based family supports are required this is part of the communication and community engagement pillar. Other community based interventions such TUSLA (Methil), Garda Diversion Programmes, Resettlement agency are all actors in this.

All of these options exist but not used specifically for family reasons, prisoners without children can utilise most of these options as well. For detained parents there are specific training courses and a family officer or case manager monitors the development in the child-parent relation. There is also cooperation with community based family support as part of the communication and community engagement pillar. One NGO, named Exodus, is running transition houses where (ex-)detainees can stay for six months maximum to get used to a life after detention in a protected way. In one transition house for women, it is possible to stay with children under the age of 12. Besides the transition houses also ambulant support is given by Exodus, but can also be given by mothers or older children.

Yes all of these options exist but are not used specifically for family reasons

Yes all of these options exist but are not used specifically for family reasons

Home leave in place; Open conditions; Electronic Monitoring in place.

Two “halfway” houses – maison de transition - (with 15 places each, one French-speaking and one Dutch-speaking side) were created a year ago. We are in a pilot phase in relation to these structures. It is planned, in the medium term, to open other “halfway” houses for a total of 100 places in halfway houses for the whole country.

Not a factor today It is not a decision of the SPPS.

The decision on early release from prison is incumbent on an independent court. In the preparatory statement of the prison, the resocialisation-effective factors of the contacts with the children are to be taken into account.

N/A

Please see my comment for art. 42

Regulations of the Prison Code are in accordance with this Rec.

Already considered as part of the release process

Already considered as part of the release process

Already considered as part of the release process

Risk Management Team Guidance reflects care giving responsibilities; HDC & Progression will be considered when being reviewed.

The children are the responsibility of the social service although the SPPS can before release make a notification to the social service that the family can be in need of support.

Insofar as the "promotion of healthy child development" is the subject of this recommendation, the responsibility lies with the authorities responsible for family and youth. Co-operation between the prison system and external institutions - e.g. probationary services, independent help for offenders, actors of social welfare - as well as reintegration programmes are increasingly successful (e.g. in the field of vocational promotion, addiction support, debt settlement, transition management, etc.). The concepts should be expanded to include aspects of family reintegration and parental skills. It would be conceivable to involve these organisations more closely in the context of family-related services already during the execution of the sentence. The social and family ministries and civil society organisations are also addressed.

Trough an extensive and successful cooperation with the Verein Neustart, an attempt is made to ensure reintegration in all areas. Family reintegration could be brought into focus more

We are always involved in the procedures for assisting our imprisoned parents, if necessary, with other agencies and probation. However for the pre-release programs we are actively involved as described in art.44

Regulations of the Prison Code are in accordance with this Rec.

The prison has strong community links where we work with families, particularly partners of our prisoners and assist regarding access to adult education and training opportunities. We also provide a summer camp for children of prisoners on an annual basis.

The prison has strong community links where we work with families of our prisoners and assist regarding access to adult education and training opportunities. NGO’s are part of the networks, supporting (ex)detainees and their families, but also organizing training activities, interventions and child-parent activities in prisons. Programs and interventions to develop a positive parent-child-relation, as part of sentence planning and preparation for release. There is attention for specific family reintegration needs if the family has contact with volunteer organizations like Exodus, Humanitas and Gevangenenzorg Nederland (member of Prison Fellowship International).

Various rehabilitation programs, family counseling, talks, individual group meetings with different helpers etc. are offered. The prison has strong community links with voluntary organizations such as the Red Cross, Church Mission, The Organisation for Families and Friends of Prisoners (FFP), Way Back, etc.

An inter-institutional approach of children with parents in detention is embraced while implementing the new 2020-2024 National Strategy for Inmates’ Social Reintegration.

In prisons there shall be established exit units to which prisoners, who are placed in reasonable time before the expected end of prison sentence, and also prisoners who shall be helped in creating favourable conditions for the independent way of life; the prison shall cooperate closely with the state bodies, local municipality bodies, legal persons, physical persons, interest associations of citizens, churches, religious communities, foundations and charity organizations.

Throughcare services in place

There is a clear lack of such structures in the country. We need to pay more attention to this in the coming years to develop parenting support programs (intramural and extramural).

Regarding policy development and implementation the SPPS pays regard to the convention on the rights of the child.

New regulations, guidelines, standards, requirements, concepts or measures should take into account the rights and needs of children. It is advisable to review and, if necessary, adapt existing regulations.

Expected for the specific efforts mentioned already, not yet Getting in touch with organisations which deal with this topic and which offer specific concepts as well as obtaining cost estimates and starting measures in pilot institutes.

All of our policies or security measures never outweigh the best interest of the child. Further they are developed with due regard to the rights and needs of the child, aiming at supporting positive child-parent relationship.

Before adopting and introducing a new regulation, suggestions of concerned/relevant prison institutions are gathered and assessed.

The Family And Imprisonment Group advise the IPS in relation to child and family issues in relation to policy development and implementation

We’re working on it to organize structural attention to child and family issues in relation to policy development and implementation. More needs to be done

The Directorate and the prison management are responsible for ensuring that children's rights are protected by any changes or new areas of development. The responsibility of the child coordinator is to safeguard the children's perspective in prisons

The new National Strategy for Inmates’ Social Reintegration 2020-2024 includes measures specially dedicated to the minors and youngsters accommodated in the educational and detention centres.

Not regulated by current legislation, but many helpful things we do

All new policies have an Equality & Human rights impact assessment carried out by SPS policy leads; Family Strategy group in place in each establishment.

All staff have basic or specialized training in child practise every unit have one or more staff that has a special responsibility on child practise so alled child ombud…

The function of "child and/or family officers" should be additionally designated and, depending on the size and responsibility of the correctional institutions, appropriately taken into account in terms of staff planning. The implementation of the tasks contained in the recommendation and the readiness in the prisons for the special protection of the children of prisoners can only be achieved if personnel resources are also made available and the implementation of the recommendation is not transferred to the already existing personnel as an additional task.The finance ministries are equally responsible.

There are no designated child officers The special sevices are currently designeated as mainly responsible for famil matters. However, additional ressources would be needed. It is planned to create brochures for children like in Sweden or Norway. The prison Wien-Simmering has made already a small booklet together with inmates which is used to distribute to children.

Art. 46 is fully implemented

At the moment there is no designated “title” or position for family officer at the prison service.

Yes (Provided in some locations only) IPS aware of the need to provide family Liaison Officers. Currently a second hat activity. Resources required to Policy decision regarding resources required. Local prisons are addressing but specific resources are required for successful engagement with the voice of the child.

We have family Liaison Officers and in two prisons the extended Family Approach, of which we learn many lessons for all other prisons. Besides staff training in hospitality there are plans to organise evidence-based child-centered training courses in cooperation with NGOs and universities. European subsidiary is requested. More needs to be done

Child coordinator at all units is responsible for ensuring that the areas mentioned in the article are taken care of.

Currently, this kind of issues in SPS is unresolved (legislative)

Family Contact Officers role in place at all establishments; Family Strategy group in place in each establishment; Current work ongoing of an eLearning package for staff on the SPS Family Strategy, Corporate Parenting and Child protection; Child friendly visit rooms; Visitor Centre’s in 12 of the 15 establishments; Continuing Professional Development sessions available for professionals and associations.

It's note the case and it's an important project for the years to come.

All staff have basic or specialized training in child practise every unit have one or more staff that has a special responsibility on child practise so called child ombud..

The requirements for dealing with children of detainees should be the subject of further training for prison staff and should be taken into account in the training of trainees. Staff who are in frequent contact with children due to their function (such as gatekeepers or visiting officers) should also undergo further training on the rights and needs of children. Staff who are in close contact with detained parents (such as ward officers, reference officers or social service staff) should be trained, inter alia, in motivational interviewing (cf. Recommendation No. 30).

There is no special training for employees that take all of these aspects As a first step, the prison staff/ officers who organice the visits werde made aware of the issue. Trainings should be included in the basic training conditions for prison staff

Art 47 is fully implemented.

At the moment the staff does not receive a training on the right of children who are left at home

FLOs were trained on all aspects. More needs to be done

We have family Liaison Officers and in two prisons the extended Family Approach, of which we learn many lessons for all other prisons. Besides staff training in hospitality there are plans to organise evidence-based child-centered training courses in cooperation with NGOs and universities. European subsidiary is requested. More needs to be done

There are regular courses for child-coordinators, and specific training for program managers for parenting programs.

Currently, this kind of issues in SPS is unresolved (legislative

Family Contact Officer Development day has taken place; Family Strategy Groups in place for support at each establishment

It's note the case and it's an important project for the years to come.

All staff have basic or specialized training in child practise every unit have one or more staff that has a special responsibility on child practise so called child ombud. Some staff is educated in parental courses.

The trainings and advanced trainings that already exist and are still to be created must always be kept up to date in legal and practical terms. This requires continuous quality management, including current research results.

First of all, training must be implemented in order to be able to check it.

Art. 48 is fully implemented

At the moment the staff does not receive training on the rights of children who are left at home.

Evaluated and bespoke training packages are in place Resources need to be ring fenced for this activity to be embedded.

Staff training programmes are not always evidence-based yet. See also 46 More needs to be done

There is no one national multi-agency with an overall responsibility, but the prison has strong community links with probation service, local community and child welfare service, the police, the Ombudsperson for Children etc

Currently, this kind of issues in SPS is unresolved (legislative)

This highlights the need to provide up to date training to staff and this is being worked on currently with SPS College. New eLearning package being worked on for SPS Family Strategy, Corporate Parenting & Child protection and links to all relevant legislation; Child protection policy has been reviewed 2019.

No agency has taken overall responsibility for providing a multi-agency cross-sectoral approach to the issue of children with imprisoned parents. The need has been stressed from both SPPS, the child ombudsman and NGOs. The SPPS keep on stress the importance of a multi-agency cross sectoral approach.

Protecting the rights and welfare of children of imprisoned parents is not the task of the prison system alone. Only interdisciplinary cooperation comprehensively takes into account the needs of children and their parents. It is therefore necessary to identify thematic interfaces at departmental level and to work towards forming new networks or expanding existing networks. Prisons should cooperate with existing local and regional networks in the future.The interior, social and family ministries are also responsible, as are civil society organisations where appropriate.

Austrian prison service organizes training concerning release preparation together with the probation service. There is the idea to use this existing platform to amend all the discussed challenges with family relating issues. On the basis of a decree all prisons have to carry out “network meetings'' with regional partners and NGOs, including childs welfare, family, probation service, healthcare facilities to uphold the quality management concerning release preparation.

There is not a multi-agency and cross-sectoral approach as I mentioned in the first meeting of our WG in Cork

There is a good cooperation with the partner authorities, organizations, services

No one agency has taken overall responsibility for providing a multi-agency cross-sectoral approach to the issue of children’s rights. The Ombudsman for children, the Child and family agency and the entire justice sector need to engage with the topic and develop a cohesive strategy

The Centre of Expertise K I N D (that means child) is an assembly of professionals, knowledge and networks and gives information, advice and training to family and social networks of children such as teachers, social workers or prison staff. They provide a multi-agency cross-sectoral approach to the issue of children’s rights and are often consulted

No one has taken overall responsibility for providing a multi-agency cross-sectoral approach to the issue of children’s rights

In some areas The Children’s ombudsman do pay attention to the group of children of imprisoned parents but the social service on national level need more focus on this group. the big challenge is to achieve cohesion in the overall approach at a national level that takes account of the recommendations.

The recommendation is addressed not only to the ministries of justice but also to other ministries, each of which is responsible for monitoring compliance with the recommendation on behalf of its own department. This monitoring can take place in the area of the correctional system through supervisory visits and business audits or corresponding reports. In addition, the Laender justice administrations should be able to report on appropriate enquiries (for example, from the Council of Europe pursuant to No. 15b of the Statute of the Council of Europe) on ensuring appropriate measures for the protection of children in detention. Furthermore, the responsibility also lies with the Ministries of the Interior, Social Affairs and Family.

In Austria, the Children and Judicial Attorney produce reports on child rights review. The member Network of Children's Rights also provides reports to the United Nations. As Ireland, the major challenge is to achieve a national cohesion following the recommendations.

They are involved only if there is a complain There are no multi-agency and multidisciplinary-expert groups. However, we are always in contact with imprisoned parents to resolve any issues regarding their children inside and outside prisons. Further, we revise our procedures and policies, and we invest accordingly in the training of the staff based on best practice examples, relevant CoE recommendations, civil society actors, COPE recommendations etc., in order to support positive relationships as much as possible, by meeting the individual needs of the child.

Such report is prepared.

The Children’s ombudsman and other bodies do provide annual reports in terms of children’s rights but appear to overlook children of imprisoned parents in such reports. The big challenge is to achieve cohesion in the overall approach at a national level that takes account of the recommendations.

The Children’s ombudsman and other bodies like the Centre of Expertise KIND provide annual reports and advices in terms of children’s rights, including advices about children of imprisoned parents.

The Ombudsperson for Children, UN Children's Committee in Norway and other organization do provide annual reports in terms of children’s rights.

Family Strategy meetings are taking place in each establishment with improvement plans in place. Covid restrictions are currently uimpacting these meetings

Ombudspersons for Children, the issue of children of imprisoned parents has not been resolved in detail